TEST: Fuji 14mm f2.8 and the Fuji 10-24mm f4

-
Last Thursday I bought the Fujinon 10-24mm f4 wide angle zoom lens and yesterday I gave my first impressions of this new addition to the MacLean Photographic arsenal HERE.  Now this lens covers the focal lengths of two of my prime lenses, the 18mm f2 and the 14mm f2.8 and a couple of people have asked if I will sell those lenses now that I have the 10-24mm.

The 18mm f2 is a superb lens and I have already given my verdict on this moderately wide angle fast lens HERE.  It is a compact lens with an f2 maximum aperture that is 2 stops faster than the 10-24mm f4.  For those reasons alone the 18mm prime has a place in my camera bag.

On the other hand a decision on the 14mm f2.8 is a bit more difficult to call.  Physically the 14mm is a big lens and, at f2.8, is only one stop faster than the 10-24mm.  So I took both lenses out into the Lammermuir Hills and ran them side by side, the 10-24mm fitted to the X-T1 and the 14mm to the X-Pro1.


The shot above was taken on the 10-24mm at 13.2mm according to the lens data in the file information.  I selected 14mm on the zoom dial but it was slightly wider than the setting on the lens.  No matter the field of view it almost the same and it provides a good comparison to the image below that was taken on the Fujinon 14mm f2.8.  The exposure on both lenses was 1/250 @ f8 with the iso set at 200.


As you can see the difference is negligible.  As another comparison here is the same scene but with the zoom set at 10mm -


As I indicated at the start of this feature, one of the differences between the two lenses is the fact that the prime lens has a maximum aperture of f2.8 while the zoom has a maximum aperture of f4.  When shooting close objects at maximum aperture the difference in the depth of field can be demonstrated.


The image above is from the 10-24mm at f4 and the shot below is from the 14mm at f2.8, once again the difference is negligible between the two lenses. 


The conclusion from this short test is there isn't a great deal to choose between the two lenses. In low light the 14mm has a one stop advantage but the 10-24mm has an Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS) system that is effectively worth 3-4 stops, so that negates the advantage of the f2.8 lens - unless, of course, I am in a situation where I need to use a faster shutter speed where the extra notch on the aperture ring has the advantage.  

 For now I will keep both lenses and see what happens over the coming months.  I love using the 14mm prime and I am sure it will still get some use in the future.  How much remains to be seen.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE SUPPORT THIS BLOG BY CLICKING THE GOOGLE ADVERTS
It doesn't cost you anything to click on an advert but we get a small fee for every click thru from Google and this helps support this blog - thank you for helping
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALL IMAGES ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACLEAN PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CANNOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION


If you like what you see on this blog please visit our Facebook page and click 'like'


Comments

  1. Unknown5 December 2017 at 11:29

    If I'm looking just one wide angle lens which one your recommendation? 10-24mm, 14mm or 18mm? Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Macsport5 December 2017 at 13:39

      If you want an all round wide angle then the 10-24mm f4 zoom is a good choice. I have 10-24mm alongside two prime lenses 16mm f1.4 and the 18mm f2. The 18mm f2 offers great quality is a very small package and for travelling is a great choice. The 16mm f1.4 offers a slightly wider angle (24mm equivalent) and is a stop faster than the 18mm and three stops faster than the 10-24mm. It is also bitingly sharp. The 14mm f2.8, which I have since sold, is also a great lens but I didn't use it much because I had the 10-24mm in my bag. 14mm (21mm equivalent) is a great focal length for landscapes.

      I hope this helps?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The New Fujinon 2x Converter

-
Image
Yesterday Fujifilm launched the latest edition to the Fujinon XF lens line up, the XF 2X TC WR teleconverter for use with the XF50-140mm f2.8 and XF100-400mm f4.5/5.6 zoom lenses.  In April I was invited by Fujifilm to test the new converter and here are my thoughts on this new lens. Before I go into details I need to be upfront about something.  I've never been a fan of 2x converters because the optical quality of the lens is usually affected to a large degree.   I did have a 1.4x and 2x converter for my lenses when I was shooting with Nikon. While the 1.4x converter was regularly attached to my long f2.8 lenses, the 2x converter was probably used about three times in the 18 years I used Nikkor lenses.  I didn't like the results when using the converter so tended to not use it. Anyway back to the X-Series!  The 1.4x Fujinon converter was launched in 2015 and I have been a fan of this diminutive lens attachment on both the 50-140mm and 100-400mm....
Read more

Review: Little and Large - Using a Fujifilm X-T20 for Sport

-
Image
In July 2015 I posted a review of the Fujifilm X-T10 which I tested alongside my X-T1 as a lightweight alternative to the larger and more expensive camera.  So when Fujifilm announced the launch of the X-T20 I was keen to put one to the test.   I took an X-T20 along with me to the FIA World Endurance Championship event at Spa-Francorchamps and also shot the TCR International Series race during the European Le Mans Series event in Monza.  I also took a few shots with it during the recent Water Ski event at Hazelwood Ski Centre last month and these three events really put the X-T20 through its paces. Like the X-T10, the T20 is tiny compared to it's bigger brother.  Even with the battery grip removed from the T2,  the picture above shows the larger camera dwarfing the X-T20.   Now this can be seen as a good thing if you are traveling and need a lightweight camera with a big punch but when using it with long lenses such as the 50-140mm or 100-400m...
Read more

REVIEW: Using Nikon Lenses on a Fuji X Camera

-
Image
I've been using the Fujifilm X-Pro1 for the past month and I haven't enjoyed my photography so much since I bought the Fuji X100 12 months earlier.  The only issue I have with the X-Pro1 is the lack of a long telephoto lens.  The longest lens I have is the 60mm f2.4, which is the equivalent of a 90mm telephoto; it's a great lens but I sometimes wish my Fuji system had a bit more pulling power.   Fuji have provided the X system with a telephoto zoom, the 55-200mm f3.5 / f4.8 R LM OIS and I will be testing this lens next week for three days. I will be showing the results on this blog. However my Nikon kit has one of the best short telephoto zooms in the world, the Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D.  I bought this lens brand new in 1996 for £1600.00 and it has been a faithful companion ever since. I've bought and sold plenty of SLRs / DSLRs in the past 18 years but I've never felt the need to upgrade the 80-200mm because it is still optically the best lens I own and it ha...
Read more