I've been using the Fujifilm X-Pro1 for the past month and I haven't enjoyed my photography so much since I bought the Fuji X100 12 months earlier. The only issue I have with the X-Pro1 is the lack of a long telephoto lens. The longest lens I have is the 60mm f2.4, which is the equivalent of a 90mm telephoto; it's a great lens but I sometimes wish my Fuji system had a bit more pulling power. Fuji have provided the X system with a telephoto zoom, the 55-200mm f3.5 / f4.8 R LM OIS and I will be testing this lens next week for three days. I will be showing the results on this blog. However my Nikon kit has one of the best short telephoto zooms in the world, the Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D. I bought this lens brand new in 1996 for £1600.00 and it has been a faithful companion ever since. I've bought and sold plenty of SLRs / DSLRs in the past 18 years but I've never felt the need to upgrade the 80-200mm because it is still optically the best lens I own and it ha...
Hi Mr. Carter. I really enjoy your blog and admire your work. Therefore, this comment is meant just as a friendly heads up:
ReplyDeleteThe Eiffel Tower, built in 1889, falls within the public domain.
Daytime views from the Eiffel Tower are rights-free.
However, its various illuminations are subject to author’s rights as well as brand rights. Usage of these images is subject to prior request from the "Société d’Exploitation de la Tour Eiffel" (the Eiffel Tower’s operating company, or SETE).
The citation "Eiffel Tower", the names of the various services offered on the monument as well as domain names are also registered.
While according to french copyright law, taking pictures of the Eiffel Tower (anytime) is perfectly permissible, publishing (and this includes private websites) nighttime pictures of the illuminated Eiffel Tower infringes the copyright of the SETE, the company operating the Tour Eiffel.
All the best, DB
That's really interesting and thank you for the 'heads up'. I did a google search because I thought this must be a joke and apparently it isn't. I respect all copyright but this is crazy, how can someone copyright this? These images are not for sale, this blog is a diary of my travels to Paris and other places around the world. If SETE are so petty as to demand these images are removed then I will, of course, comply.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately it´s not a joke. The Sete constructs their copyright around the "separate artwork" of the lighting installation. That´s why daytime pictures are no problem. Not sure how active they SETE pursues this issue, but I learned (the hard way) that publishing non-commercial, private photographs of (unknown to me at the time) copyrighted buildings on my private Facebook page is already considered an infringement and can cause an immediately costly cease and desist order. :-(
ReplyDeleteKeep up your great work!