REVIEW: 100% Natural Ingredient Lens Cleaner

-


As a photographer occasionally I am asked to try new products that offer something different from their competitors or sometimes offer a different solution.  I was asked to try a lens cleaning product that claimed to use 100% natural ingredients and be 100% safe for pets and children.  Lens cleaning products contain chemicals and I try to minimise my use of harmful chemicals in every part of my daily life where possible.

 The RCS Products lens cleaner is described on their website as 'made from natural plant derivatives, organic salts and minerals and is a non-smear product that absorbs dirt rather than chemically breaking it down'.

 I decided to test it on an X20 lens and LCD screen.  I made a greasy thumb print on the lens to see how it would cope in removing it.  I have to say I noticed no different between the ease of removal between the usual chemical based lens cleaner I use and the RCS Products lens cleaner.  I then cleaned the eye piece and the LCD screen (shame it can't remove scratches) and have to say it performed brilliantly.  I left the camera on the shelf for two days to see if there was reaction after cleaning and there is nothing to report, the lens and LCD is spotless.

 Now this product doesn't clean the lenses any better than the chemical based products but that's the point of the post, it does the job really well without leaving any smearing or residue and uses 100% natural products that are safe.  For me this is a winner and I will now be using this product in the future.  I just need to find a similar product for wet cleaning the sensors on my Fujifilm cameras now!

 A bottle of the RCS Products Lens Cleaner is £3.49 + P&P but they have a special 3 for 2 offer at the moment.  CLICK HERE to go the RCS Products website.

 And I have just bought three more bottles because I think it is that good!





 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE SUPPORT THIS BLOG BY VISITING THE ADVERTISERS ON THIS PAGE
By clicking on the adverts you are helping support this blog - thank you.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALL IMAGES ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACLEAN PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CANNOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION

MacLean Photographic run Tours and Workshops in East Lothian and the Borders of Scotland.  CLICK HERE for more details and availability

In June 2015 Jeff Carter was named as a Fujifilm brand ambassador and you can view his profile and gallery on the Fujifilm website HERE


If you like what you see on this blog please visit our Facebook page and click 'like'


Comments

  1. Chris Tweed30 September 2016 at 13:59

    I quite agree, if you can do a job just as well without using anything harmful then go for it! I'll be looking into this stuff.

    Seeing as how you mention sensor cleaning, I would be interested to know what solution you currently use for this? I do find that both my X-Pro1 and X-Pro2 pick up more dust that I was used to with any of my DSLRs and I would imagine that's due to the very fact that they are mirrorless; you take off the lens and the sensor is right there. I enjoy both long exposure and time lapse photography and in both cases it can be useful to use very small apertures - and of course that's when the dust specs show.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Macsport30 September 2016 at 15:42

      Hi Chris, thank you for commenting.

      Yes I agree that there is more dust pick on the sensors of CSC cameras than DSLRs probably because the sensor is open when you change lenses whereas with a DSLR there is a mirror to protect the sensor from dust being blown onto it when the lenses are swapped.

      I try to minimise this by changing the lens with my back to the wind and, if possible, under cover. I use a blower to clean the sensor at regular intervals and at the end of the day. If I need to clean the sensor I use DIGIPAD Sensor Cleaning which I get from Amazon. I usual do a wet clean once a month (or if I do long exposure images just before I do that particular shoot.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The New Fujinon 2x Converter

-
Image
Yesterday Fujifilm launched the latest edition to the Fujinon XF lens line up, the XF 2X TC WR teleconverter for use with the XF50-140mm f2.8 and XF100-400mm f4.5/5.6 zoom lenses.  In April I was invited by Fujifilm to test the new converter and here are my thoughts on this new lens. Before I go into details I need to be upfront about something.  I've never been a fan of 2x converters because the optical quality of the lens is usually affected to a large degree.   I did have a 1.4x and 2x converter for my lenses when I was shooting with Nikon. While the 1.4x converter was regularly attached to my long f2.8 lenses, the 2x converter was probably used about three times in the 18 years I used Nikkor lenses.  I didn't like the results when using the converter so tended to not use it. Anyway back to the X-Series!  The 1.4x Fujinon converter was launched in 2015 and I have been a fan of this diminutive lens attachment on both the 50-140mm and 100-400mm.  The optical qu
Read more

REVIEW: Using Nikon Lenses on a Fuji X Camera

-
Image
I've been using the Fujifilm X-Pro1 for the past month and I haven't enjoyed my photography so much since I bought the Fuji X100 12 months earlier.  The only issue I have with the X-Pro1 is the lack of a long telephoto lens.  The longest lens I have is the 60mm f2.4, which is the equivalent of a 90mm telephoto; it's a great lens but I sometimes wish my Fuji system had a bit more pulling power.   Fuji have provided the X system with a telephoto zoom, the 55-200mm f3.5 / f4.8 R LM OIS and I will be testing this lens next week for three days. I will be showing the results on this blog. However my Nikon kit has one of the best short telephoto zooms in the world, the Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D.  I bought this lens brand new in 1996 for £1600.00 and it has been a faithful companion ever since. I've bought and sold plenty of SLRs / DSLRs in the past 18 years but I've never felt the need to upgrade the 80-200mm because it is still optically the best lens I own and it ha
Read more

Rode Wireless Go for the Fujifilm X-T4

-
Image
One of the things I learned very quickly when using video is the need for clear audio. It doesn't matter how good the video looks, if the audio is poor, then the video is not going to be well received. Over the years I have invested in good, portable microphones even invested in a radio mic system.  This worked really well but when working in a motorsport environment, a broad range of radio frequencies are used for various uses and radio microphone frequencies are strictly controlled.  in some countries you also need to buy a licence, which can cost hundreds of pounds, so I quickly reverted back to wired microphones. This brought its own problems as when interviewing drivers the surrounding environment can be noisy, so you need to get the microphone as close as possible.  Of course, the extra added complication in the last few months means the interviewer has to stand at least 1.5 metres, which means wires trailing across the floor, which isn't good. In March
Read more