Review: Fujinon XF16-55mm f2.8R LM WR

-

The Fujinon XF16-55mm f2.8R LM WR is Fujifilm's second 'red badge' professional zoom and covers the standard 35mm focal range of 24mm to 84mm with a constant f2.8 maximum aperture.  This, along with the Fujinon XF50-140mm f2.8R LM WR OIS, makes up Fujifilm's professional zoom offering.  

 We have had a 50-140mm f2.8 since June and this lens lives up to all the hype and press coverage as it is a match for anything that the other manufacturers can produce in this focal length range with a fast aperture. So it was with interest that I tested the 50-140's smaller sibling to see if it can match the quality of the larger lens.


There are a few physical differences between the 50-140mm and the 16-55mm (and we are not talking about physical size.  The 16-55 is a big lens but it isn't too big.  Unlike the 50-140mm, the lens extends when zoomed towards the long end of the zoom range.  This is a little disappointing for me as I expected the zoom function to be internal like the 50-140mm.  It is a minor issue when the image quality is taken into account but....

The second item you notice is the lack of a switch for the Optical Image Stablisation (OIS) and these three letters are missing from the full name of the lens.  Now for me this isn't a problem and if an OIS system had been included it would've added even more to the bulk of the lens.  Now some photographers have complained bitterly about the lack of OIS but I cut my teeth as a photographer using manual lenses and OIS was a thing of science fiction.  The f2.8 maximum aperture allows you to keep the shutter speed at a reasonable level as the light drops and when it drops too much you just up the ISO a bit to compensate.

The third item is the 77mm diameter filter ring, which is bigger than the 72mm filter thread on the 50-140mm.  I wish Fujifilm would stick to one or two filter ring sizes instead of chopping and changing.  As it happens all my screw in filters and my Lee slot in filter system are configured for 77mm as this is something I had on my old Nikon system.  I have been using step up rings for the various lens filter sizes so at least on the 16-55mm I wont need to utilise these step ring for once.


The 16-55mm proudly wears the WR (Weather Resistant) label on the front of the lens and I can report that the WR does work after I got caught in a huge deluge last Saturday at Estoril while photographing the European Le Mans Series.  I did a blog the excellent Weather Resistance of the Fujifilm kit HERE and while most of the images were taken on the 50-140mm, the 16-55mm performed equally well in the challenging conditions.


 The zoom range is perfect for a lens of this size. The 24mm equivalent focal length on the wide end is perfect and allows me to get a lot into the frame without having to get the excellent XF10-24mm f4 out of the bag.  The 84mm equivalent on the telephoto end is also a great focal length and if I need a faster aperture I always have the 56mm f1.2 in the bag.

 The build quality of the XF16-55mm f2.8 is on a par with all the other XF range of lenses and is built to last.  I had an unfortunate accident when the camera fell off the tripod because I hadn't secured it properly.  The camera and lens fell 1.2m to the concrete floor and I thought that was it, game over.  No, the camera and lens just shrugged off the impact and carried on working. 

However it is the quality of the images the XF16-55mm f2.8 produces that is key and here are some images from the grid walk on Sunday afternoon at Estoril.  The weather was overcast but the images that I got from the 15-minutes on the grid were all very usable. 

 Because the focal range of the zoom covered most of what I needed with a fast f2.8 aperture, I was able to cover the grid walk with just one camera and one lens, which was very liberating.. 

 Here are some sample images from the ELMS is Portugal -










Conclusion
The XF16-55mm f2.8R LM WR is a lens worthy of the premium 'red badge'.  The quality is as we would expect from a professional XF Fujinon lens.  The lack of OIS will put some people off buying this lens but they will be missing something that is capable of rivalling the best prime lenses out there that has the flexibility of a good focal length range.

 For me it is a no brainer to have the 16-55mm f2.8 in my camera bag.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE SUPPORT THIS BLOG BY VISITING THE ADVERTISERS ON THIS PAGE
By clicking on the adverts you are helping support this blog - thank you.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALL IMAGES ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACLEAN PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CANNOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION

MacLean Photographic run Tours and Workshops in East Lothian and the Borders of Scotland.  CLICK HERE for more details and availability

Jeff Carter was recently named as a Fujifilm brand ambassador and you can view his profile and gallery on the Fujifilm website HERE

If you like what you see on this blog please visit our Facebook page and click 'like'

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The New Fujinon 2x Converter

-
Image
Yesterday Fujifilm launched the latest edition to the Fujinon XF lens line up, the XF 2X TC WR teleconverter for use with the XF50-140mm f2.8 and XF100-400mm f4.5/5.6 zoom lenses.  In April I was invited by Fujifilm to test the new converter and here are my thoughts on this new lens. Before I go into details I need to be upfront about something.  I've never been a fan of 2x converters because the optical quality of the lens is usually affected to a large degree.   I did have a 1.4x and 2x converter for my lenses when I was shooting with Nikon. While the 1.4x converter was regularly attached to my long f2.8 lenses, the 2x converter was probably used about three times in the 18 years I used Nikkor lenses.  I didn't like the results when using the converter so tended to not use it. Anyway back to the X-Series!  The 1.4x Fujinon converter was launched in 2015 and I have been a fan of this diminutive lens attachment on both the 50-140mm and 100-400mm....
Read more

REVIEW: Using Nikon Lenses on a Fuji X Camera

-
Image
I've been using the Fujifilm X-Pro1 for the past month and I haven't enjoyed my photography so much since I bought the Fuji X100 12 months earlier.  The only issue I have with the X-Pro1 is the lack of a long telephoto lens.  The longest lens I have is the 60mm f2.4, which is the equivalent of a 90mm telephoto; it's a great lens but I sometimes wish my Fuji system had a bit more pulling power.   Fuji have provided the X system with a telephoto zoom, the 55-200mm f3.5 / f4.8 R LM OIS and I will be testing this lens next week for three days. I will be showing the results on this blog. However my Nikon kit has one of the best short telephoto zooms in the world, the Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D.  I bought this lens brand new in 1996 for £1600.00 and it has been a faithful companion ever since. I've bought and sold plenty of SLRs / DSLRs in the past 18 years but I've never felt the need to upgrade the 80-200mm because it is still optically the best lens I own and it ha...
Read more

Comparison: Fujinon 16mm f1.4 v Fujinon 18mm f2

-
Image
The small but perfectly formed Fujinon XF18mm f2R has been the lens I have used the most since I bought it in 2013.  The fast f2 aperture along with the small size and 27mm equivalent angle of view makes the 18mm f2 my 'go to' lens.   However has the new 16mm f1.4 usurped this position?  The slightly wider 24mm equivalent focal length is one that I used to have when I used film cameras and for landscapes it is a great lens to have in the bag.  But how different is the 18mm and 16mm?  Is that 2mm going to make a huge amount of difference?  and will that extra stop on the aperture compensate for the difference in the physical size of the 16mm compared to the 18mm?  I went for a walk along the coastal path in Dunbar down to the harbour and took there shots with the X-T10 fitted with the 18mm f2 and my X-T1 fitted with the 16mm f1.4.  As usual for this blog I need to point out that this is NOT a technical test, I don't do that, I just report...
Read more