REVIEW: Fujinon XF35mm f1.4R 'versus' X100 + TCL-X100

-


In April I did a comparison test between the Fujinon XF18mm f2R and the WCL-X100, which converts the 23mm f2 lens on the X100 to a 19mm f2 lens.  Since then I have added a TCL-X100 to my kit which converts the 23mm on the X100 to a 33mm f2, almost the same focal length as the superb XF35mm f1.4R.  So after using the TCL-X100 out and about I decided to do a back-to-back review on the two lenses and see if the tele converter for the X100 can match the output from the 35mm f1.4 on the X-Pro1.


SIZE
First a quick size comparison.  The TCL-X100 is a big lens, much larger than the WCL-X100, adding an extra 46.5mm to the X100's existing optic, although it's not too heavy at 180g (30g more than the WCL-X100 wide-angle conversion lens).

 If you check out the image above you will see the profile of the X100 has significantly changed with the converter fitted and is now slightly wider front to back than the X-Pro1 with the 35mm.  

 The X-Pro1 stands slightly taller but I do have the handgrip attached to my camera and this accounts for the extra height.  So the size advantage that the X100 usually has has been negated when the TCL-X100 is used.


RESULTS
The good thing about the WCL and TCL converters is they are specially designed for the X100 / X100S / X100T and the firmware has been adjusted to account for any distortion when using the converters.  The result is the images from either converter is spot on from f2 right through to f16.  

 AUTOFOCUS ON THE X100
The AF on the X100 doesn't seem to be affected by the fitting of the converters. I have seen some reports of owners complaining that the AF system on their cameras have been degraded by the fitting of the converter but my own experience using the lens is that I haven't noticed any problems or difficulties with the AF when I use the camera with either converter fitted.


FUJINON XF35mm f1.4R
Now the XF35mm lens has one advantage and that is the extra stop on the aperture over the X100s f2 lens.  The 35mm was one of the original trio of lenses launched with the X-Pro1 back in 2012.  There are rumours of a newer version of the 35mm coming soon with improved AF, but I love this lens for its low light ability, compact design and optical precision.  This is a gem of a lens and one I wont leave home without when heading out with the Fuji camera bag over my shoulder.

 PRICE
The Fujinon XF35mm f1.4 is currently available in the UK for around £399.00 (see HERE)  while the TCL-X100 is slightly cheaper with a street price of around £219.00 (see HERE). 

 PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS
As anyone who reads this blog on a regular basis knows I don't do scientific reviews, I report on how I use the equipment and how I rate them using them for my work.  There are plenty of websites for in depth, pixel peeping reviews available on the internet.  

 Here are a few images taken with the TCL-X100 and some with the XF35mm f1.4.  
TCL-X100
XF35mm f1.4R
TCL-X100
XF35mm f1.4R
TCL-X100
XF35mm f1.4
All of the shots of the Dutch Houses were shot at ISO800 @ f2 on both cameras and using natural light.  The images were converted using LR5 and adjustments made to exposure, contrast and clarity only. 

 Here are some comparison shots taken out in the field -
TCL-X100
XF35mm f1.4

TCL-X100
XF35mm f1.4
TCL-X100
XF35mm f1.4
TCL-X100
XF35mm f1.4
Here are some more images taken on the X100 and the TCL-X100 earlier this year in Portugal.


CONCLUSION
The TCL-X100 makes the X100 more flexible for my style of working.  The focal length of 33mm gives an equivalent field of view of a 50mm standard lens on a 35mm camera.  The ability to have the equivalent of 28mm, 35mm and 50mm in a small camera is a great way to travel.

 Having said that the 35mm f1.4 Fujinon is one of my favourite lenses of all time and it is the one lens that is glued to the front of my X-Pro1 or X-T1.  The quality of the TCL-X100 is fantastic but given the choice I would prefer to have the 35mm f1.4 with me.  However I can recommend the TCL-X100 to any X100 / X100S / X100T users who are considering this converter to make their X100 more adaptable.






-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE SUPPORT THIS BLOG BY VISITING THE ADVERTISERS ON THIS PAGE
By clicking on the adverts you are helping support this blog - thank you.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALL IMAGES (UNLESS INDICATED) ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACLEAN PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CANNOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION

MacLean Photographic run Workshops in East Lothian and the Borders of Scotland.  CLICK HERE for more details and availability


Jeff Carter is an Official Fujifilm X Photographer and was named as a Fujifilm brand ambassador in June 2015. In 2016 he worked with the company on the launches of the Fujifilm X-Pro2 in Tokyo and the Fujifilm X-T2 in Paris in July 2016.  You can view his profile and gallery on the Fujifilm website HERE

If you like what you see on this blog please follow us on FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, TWITTER or FLICKR

Comments

  1. Alastair Arthur16 December 2014 at 17:15

    Thanks, a useful comparison. I've been holding off on the 35mm based on rumours of an update but might have to get one soon.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: The New Fujinon 2x Converter

-
Image
Yesterday Fujifilm launched the latest edition to the Fujinon XF lens line up, the XF 2X TC WR teleconverter for use with the XF50-140mm f2.8 and XF100-400mm f4.5/5.6 zoom lenses.  In April I was invited by Fujifilm to test the new converter and here are my thoughts on this new lens. Before I go into details I need to be upfront about something.  I've never been a fan of 2x converters because the optical quality of the lens is usually affected to a large degree.   I did have a 1.4x and 2x converter for my lenses when I was shooting with Nikon. While the 1.4x converter was regularly attached to my long f2.8 lenses, the 2x converter was probably used about three times in the 18 years I used Nikkor lenses.  I didn't like the results when using the converter so tended to not use it. Anyway back to the X-Series!  The 1.4x Fujinon converter was launched in 2015 and I have been a fan of this diminutive lens attachment on both the 50-140mm and 100-400mm.  The optical qu
Read more

REVIEW: Using Nikon Lenses on a Fuji X Camera

-
Image
I've been using the Fujifilm X-Pro1 for the past month and I haven't enjoyed my photography so much since I bought the Fuji X100 12 months earlier.  The only issue I have with the X-Pro1 is the lack of a long telephoto lens.  The longest lens I have is the 60mm f2.4, which is the equivalent of a 90mm telephoto; it's a great lens but I sometimes wish my Fuji system had a bit more pulling power.   Fuji have provided the X system with a telephoto zoom, the 55-200mm f3.5 / f4.8 R LM OIS and I will be testing this lens next week for three days. I will be showing the results on this blog. However my Nikon kit has one of the best short telephoto zooms in the world, the Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D.  I bought this lens brand new in 1996 for £1600.00 and it has been a faithful companion ever since. I've bought and sold plenty of SLRs / DSLRs in the past 18 years but I've never felt the need to upgrade the 80-200mm because it is still optically the best lens I own and it ha
Read more

Comparison: Fujinon 16mm f1.4 v Fujinon 18mm f2

-
Image
The small but perfectly formed Fujinon XF18mm f2R has been the lens I have used the most since I bought it in 2013.  The fast f2 aperture along with the small size and 27mm equivalent angle of view makes the 18mm f2 my 'go to' lens.   However has the new 16mm f1.4 usurped this position?  The slightly wider 24mm equivalent focal length is one that I used to have when I used film cameras and for landscapes it is a great lens to have in the bag.  But how different is the 18mm and 16mm?  Is that 2mm going to make a huge amount of difference?  and will that extra stop on the aperture compensate for the difference in the physical size of the 16mm compared to the 18mm?  I went for a walk along the coastal path in Dunbar down to the harbour and took there shots with the X-T10 fitted with the 18mm f2 and my X-T1 fitted with the 16mm f1.4.  As usual for this blog I need to point out that this is NOT a technical test, I don't do that, I just report on my findings in using th
Read more